United States v. James Ted Norris, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right to a public trial does not extend to non-public chambers and bench conferences on evidentiary questions, technical legal issues, and routine administrative matters
• rejecting defendant's claim \that a standard medical practice may be based on an entirely subjective standard\ because \[o]ne person's treatment methods do not alone constitute a medical practice\
• rejecting defendant’s claim “that a standard medical practice may be based on an entirely subjective standard” because “[o]ne person’s treatment methods do not alone constitute a medical practice”
• rejecting argument that good-faith instruction should reflect subjective rather than objective standard
• rejecting argument that good-faith instruction should reflect subjective rather than objective standard
• noting the distinction between suppression hearings and \routine evidentiary ruling[s]\ that occur during trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).