State v. Coons
Citations
- 992 N.W.2d 521
- 2023 ND 115
Syllabus
A closure may occur where some or all members of the public are precluded from perceiving contemporaneously what is transpiring in the courtroom, because they can neither see nor hear what is going on. When questioning occurs at the bench, the public can still observe the proceedings, thus furthering the values that the public trial right is designed to protect, and can hear the general questions posed to the jury panel. A trial court has great discretion over how to conduct a trial and to keep questioning within bounds and may remind counsel to refrain from further incursions into collateral and immaterial matters. A district court has the common law power to explain, summarize, and comment on the facts and evidence and may also question witnesses and analyze and dissect the evidence. A court may not, however, act as a witness, nor add to or distort the evidence. If a judge exceeds the limitations on his power, it may amount to prejudicial error and require reversal.
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 2010-01-19· cited 577×
- Abc, Inc. v. Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic, United States of AmericaSecond Circuit· 2004-02-18· cited 88×
- State v. TresenriterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-11-27· cited 33×
- Minot Daily News v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 30×
- Wenzel v. WenzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-05-07· cited 29×
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-10-21· cited 28×
- State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-11-06· cited 24×
- Haugen v. Mid-State Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1966-08-30· cited 20×
- Barrows v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-02-24· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-02-26· cited 19×
- State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-03-24· cited 17×
- Cameron, VanessaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-10-08· cited 16×
- State v. FoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-10-23· cited 13×
- State v. PendletonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-08-04· cited 12×
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-01-23· cited 10×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-13· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.