Skip to main content

State v. Pemberton

Citations

  • 2019 ND 157
  • 930 N.W.2d 125

Syllabus

Defendant failed to support his claim that a probable cause finding for a non-cognizable offense was obvious error. The amendment of an attempted murder charge, while an abuse of discretion, did not rise to the level of obvious error. Defendant failed to support his claim an error in the jury instructions was obvious error. Defendant failed to support his claim an error in the verdict form was obvious error. Defendant failed to support his claim that irregularities in the admonishments given to the jury during trial were obvious errors.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the district court abused its discretion in allowing amendment that “modified the elements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jensen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.