Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/29/2002

State v. Frazier

Citations

649 N.W.2d 828
2002 Minn. LEXIS 578
2002 WL 1980815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that, when statute challenged on racially disparate-impact grounds is facially neutral, challenging party must demonstrate that statute creates a racial classification in practice
stating that constitutional questions will generally not be considered for the first time on appeal
requiring a factual record to evaluate the reliability and validity of both data and data analysis presented by the parties
requiring a factual record to evaluate the reliability and validity of both data and data analysis presented by the parties
rejecting equal-protection challenge to different penalties for violation of RICO statute and the crime-committed-for-a-gang statute because people who violate each statute are not similarly situated
requiring a factual record to evaluate the reliability and validity of both data and data analysis presented by the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Paul, Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.