Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Citations

  • 418 N.E.2d 1226
  • 383 Mass. 272
  • 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating warrant that authorized seizure of unspecified “antique jewelry” in jewelry store
  • agreeing with “ ‘well reasoned’ decisions [that do] not automatically bar retrial where an insufficiency of evidence appeared only when material held on appellate review to have been erroneously admitted was notionally removed from the case”
  • \we must judge the motion to suppress solely on the record made at the suppression hearing\
  • \we must judge the motion to suppress solely on the record made at the suppression hearing\
  • where defendant makes out prima facie case, it is up to Commonwealth to produce “offsetting evidence” if it can
  • an imprecise warrant may be validated either by an affixed descriptive document or one carried by, and thus limiting, the executing officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.