Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 9/3/2002
State v. Frank
Citations
- 650 N.W.2d 213
- 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1012
- 2002 WL 2004563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that officer’s belief that driver of vehicle could consent to search of suitcases found in vehicle was mistake of law
- concluding that officer's belief that driver of vehicle could consent to search of suitcases found in vehicle was mistake of law
- holding that it was unreasonable for an officer to search a passenger's suitcase that was located in the trunk based only upon the driver's consent to < search the vehicle
- holding a driver’s consent to the search of a vehicle did not extend to a suitcase owned by a third party
- “Out of appellant’s hearing, Officer Engum asked S.J. for permission to search the vehicle . . . .”
- “The automobile exception and the consent exception to the warrant requirement are separate and distinct doctrines.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Toussaint, Stoneburner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 987×
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
- United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual EdmondsonFifth Circuit· 1999-03-08· cited 149×
- United States v. Maurice Whitfield, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1991-08-09· cited 146×
- Krise v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-09· cited 125×
- State v. ZachodniSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-02-13· cited 85×
- United States v. AndersonThird Circuit· 1988-10-21· cited 68×
- State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-17· cited 65×
- State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-06-10· cited 25×
- State v. WaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-09· cited 24×
- State v. MetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-04-26· cited 13×
- State v. Pederson-MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-12-05· cited 12×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.