State v. Poirier
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1743
Syllabus
Appellant pled guilty to resisting arrest and was sentenced to community control. In the absence of a forfeiture specification, the trial court erred in imposing a community control sanction requiring that appellant's three handguns \be remanded to the arresting agency for disposal as it sees fit.\ The trial court's broad authority to fashion community control sanctions did not extend to ordering the forfeiture of appellant's property, absent statutory authority. The community control sanction regarding handguns is vacated, and the matter is remanded for reconsideration of appellant's request for the return of his property. In all other respects, judgment affirmed. (Hall, J., concurring.)
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 1990-02-21· cited 238×
- State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-29· cited 173×
- State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-12· cited 106×
- Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-12-30· cited 72×
- State v. Chapman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 29×
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-23· cited 16×
- State v. ChristianOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-12· cited 16×
- State v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-28· cited 13×
- State v. BakhshiOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-28· cited 12×
- State v. WilesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-03· cited 9×
- State v. McMeenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 3×
- State v. SnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.