Skip to main content

State v. Fowler

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3499

Syllabus

The trial court violated appellant's right of allocution by introducing new information from outside of the record and relying on it in sentencing appellant without giving appellant or his attorney an opportunity to respond to the new information. The error was not harmless, despite appellant's failure to object, because the court raised the issue and relied heavily on it to rebut appellant's version of events.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.