Skip to main content

State v. Gipson

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2069

Syllabus

Trial court's decision to impose consecutive sentences for multiple drug convictions was affirmed because the trial court made the required findings under 2929.14(C)(4) and the record supported those findings. Additionally, the trial court's misstatement regarding defendant's eligibility to apply for judicial release did not amount to reversible error where the defendant failed to establish that he was prejudiced by the misstatement.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.