Skip to main content

State v. Yates

Citations

  • 2011 Ohio 3619
  • 195 Ohio App. 3d 33
  • 958 N.E.2d 640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for determination of whether information introduced during allocution was truly new information due to lack of record on subject
  • requiring as part of right to allocution that defendant be allowed to address new information \introduced and considered by the trial court at sentencing\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fain, Froelich, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.