State v. Wagner
Citations
- 212 N.E.3d 1119
- 2023 Ohio 1215
Syllabus
Plain error ineffective assistance of counsel comparable sentencing cumulative error abuse of discretion. Trial court did not commit plain error at sentencing where the record reflects that it reviewed all sentencing factors appropriately and made a record where required pursuant to R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). Further, appellant failed to establish he was prejudiced when the trial court considered a videotape of the crime and testimony of the victim at a codefendant's trial where the record established that there was independent evidence presented supporting the trial court's ultimate findings. Trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel. Although the competency evaluation was not a part of the appellate record during appellant's first appeal, it was in the record before the trial court. Further, the parties stipulated to its contents. Counsel's decision to summarize the evaluation rather than submit it into the record was strategic, because the contents contained multiple factors unfavorable to appellant. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to or request a continuance of the sentencing hearing. There was adequate support for the trial court's decision in the record accordingly counsel was able to discuss the change with appellant and the likely effects. Although appellant alleges there was a witness that was unavailable at the hearing, appellant failed to raise that issue before the trial court and both appellant and trial counsel agreed on the record to proceed with the advanced date. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the trial court's reliance on evidence outside the record. Prosecutor summarized criminal conduct and content of video. Appellant was not prejudiced by the trial court's consideration of the victim's testimony. Trial court did not err in sentencing appellant more harshly than a codefendant. Codefendant pleaded guilty to less serious charges and appellant was identified as the primary aggressor.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marrs v. MickelOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-14· cited 12×
- State v. GrimOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. MannsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-23· cited 3×
- State v. PlozayOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-16· cited 2×
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-05· cited 1×
- Hrina v. KLS Martin, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-09· cited 1×
- State v. CoppaOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-09
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 679×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 485×
- State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court· 1998-04-22· cited 434×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 405×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 384×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 184×
- State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 162×
- State ex rel. The V Cos. v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court· 1998-04-22· cited 142×
- State v. Thomas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-10-04· cited 87×
- State v. FerrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-24· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.