State v. Fowler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he test for whether a recording of a conversation or communication is lawful is determined under the laws of the place of the recording.\
• \[T]he test for whether a recording of a conversation or communication is lawful is determined under the laws of the place of the recording.\
• discussing development of the doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McLellan v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-05-01· cited 184×
• State v. Rafay
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
• State v. Eisfeldt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 60×
• DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC VS. BUCKLES
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2017-09-14
• Karen Warrington, individually, and as m/n/f of J.W. v. P John Edward Warrington
  D. New Hampshire· 2021-04-06

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Elkins v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
• Wolf v. Colorado
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
• State v. Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
• Lustig v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 415×
• State v. Fjermestad
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 165×
• Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 151×
• Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-02-04· cited 116×
• Roger M. Stowe v. Frank E. Devoy, United States Marshal
  Second Circuit· 1978-11-17· cited 37×
• State v. Fleming
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-08· cited 9×
• United States v. Tirinkian
  D. North Dakota· 1980-12-10· cited 8×
• State v. Fowler
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 6×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-24· cited 5×