Roger M. Stowe v. Frank E. Devoy, United States Marshal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus; finding 18 U.S.C. §§ 2515, et seq. had no extraterritorial application in another country
• interception and recording of a telephone conversation from Canada to New York governed by the law of Canada, the place where the interception occurred
• interception and recording of a telephone call recorded in Canada to New York was governed by Canada’s law, the place where the recording took place

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).