State v. Fleming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, where phone call between Oregon and Washington speakers was recorded by the Oregon speaker, Oregon law determined whether recording was lawful
• concluding that, where phone call between Oregon and Washington speakers was recorded by the Oregon speaker, Oregon law determined whether recording was lawful
• affirming murder and other convictions, noting “[t]he recording was made in Oregon lawfully, and Washington law simply does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 151×
• State v. Fowler
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 15×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-24· cited 5×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 4×
• Karen Warrington, individually, and as m/n/f of J.W. v. P John Edward Warrington
  D. New Hampshire· 2021-04-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Franks v. Delaware
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
• State v. Cord
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 166×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 101×
• State v. Mayes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-06-20· cited 21×
• State v. Coatney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-14· cited 18×
• State v. Willcutt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-09-23· cited 17×
• State v. Rector
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 8×