Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/8/1999

State v. Ford

Citations

513 S.E.2d 385
334 S.C. 444
1999 S.C. App. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding use of a mug shot in a photographic lineup was not improper character evidence because they were displayed \in such a way as to hide any indication of their origin\ and no testimony \reveal[ed] the origin of the photographs\
finding a line-up including a photo of the appellant was admissible \because the state had a demonstrable need to introduce the photos and because there was nothing about the photographs or the way they were introduced that suggested [the appellant] had a prior criminal record\
\Any Batson violation in regards to a possible alternate juror is harmless where an alternate was not needed for deliberations.\
even if judge erred in accepting prosecutor’s reasons for striking potential female juror, error harmless because she had been struck as alternate and use of alternates was not necessary during trial
to preserve objection to jury charge, defendant must raise the issue at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Howell, Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.