Oregon Supreme Court· 11/1/1977

State v. Flores

Citations

570 P.2d 965
280 Or. 273
1977 Ore. LEXIS 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, where the police did not use force or threat of force, made no promises, and used no other form of coercion, the defendant’s consent was voluntary and that the consented-to search therefore was valid under the Fourth Amendment
concluding that, where the defendant was arrested but the police did not use force or threat of force, made no promises, and used no other form of coercion, the defendant’s consent to search was voluntary and the consented-to search did not violate the Fourth Amendment
utilizing four criteria from Johansen’s New Federalism note and adding a fifth: “the need for a uniform standard in the area of law under discussion”
considering “the need for a uniform standard in the area of law under discussion” as a factor in its state constitutional analysis
considering “the need for a uniform standard in the area of law under discussion” as a factor in its state constitutional analysis
utilizing four criteria from Johansen’s New Federalism note and adding a fifth: “the need for a uniform standard in the area of law under discussion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryson, Linde, Denecke, Lent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.