State v. Fleming
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 740
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 11 – GUILTY PLEAS – SENTENCING: The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) before accepting defendant's guilty pleas, and defendant entered the pleas knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently: although the record reflects defendant's confusion regarding an outstanding charge, the trial court permitted defendant to consult with his attorneys off the record, and after the off-the-record discussions, defendant then indicated his desire to plead guilty to the remaining charge. The trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences where the court engaged in the required analysis under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and its findings were supported by the record: defendant had an outstanding warrant at the time of the underlying offenses and a criminal history of drug trafficking, and defendant shot the victim in the leg during the course of an aggravated robbery.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. DalmidaOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-04· cited 13×
- State v. FannonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-08· cited 5×
- State v. BatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-16· cited 4×
- State v. LittletonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-07· cited 2×
- State v. RolandOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.