State v. Roland
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 4077
Syllabus
EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY – MANIFEST WEIGHT – DOMESTIC VIOLENCE – COUNSEL – INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE – CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES: Defendant's conviction for domestic violence was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence where credible testimony established that defendant was a household member and intended to cause physical harm to the victim. Defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to move for an acquittal where defendant failed to establish that he was prejudiced because the evidence was sufficient to establish guilt. Defense counsel was not ineffective for initially failing to bring a body-camera recording to court where counsel retrieved the recording, and the recording was admitted into evidence. The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences because the record clearly and convincingly supported the trial court's findings.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- City of Barberton v. JenneyOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-02· cited 169×
- State v. McGlothanOhio Supreme Court· 2014-01-16· cited 39×
- State v. SchwegmannOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.