Supreme Court of Connecticut· 10/3/2000

State v. Fernandez

Citations

254 Conn. 637
758 A.2d 842
2000 Conn. LEXIS 294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the pro se defendant must show that if he had been afforded access to a law library, he would have “proceeded differently or pursued an alternative defense strategy”
discussing textual similarities among sixth and fourteenth amendments to United States constitution and article first, § 8, of constitution of Connecticut
treating provisions of article first, § 8, and sixth amendment as “essentially coextensive”
declining to apply de novo review to highly fact based decision of trial court on counsel’s motion to withdraw
violation of mies of practice not ground for reversal when defendant was not deprived of his constitutional rights
violation of rules of practice not ground for reversal when defendant was not deprived of his constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.