Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ‘‘in the habeas context . . . the application of the doctrine of res judicata . . . [is limited] to claims that actually have been raised and litigated in an earlier proceeding’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• \[i]t is axiomatic that [w]e may affirm a proper result of the trial court for a different reason\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• claims that require sepa- rate legal analyses are not identical for purposes of res judicata
• claims that require sepa- rate legal analyses are not identical for purposes of res judicata
• ‘‘[T]his court’s policy dictates that one panel should not, on its own, [overrule] the ruling of a previous panel. The [overruling] may be accomplished only if the appeal is heard en banc.’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• ‘‘[t]his court’s finding on direct appeal that the trial court’s statement was harmless error . . . while not dispositive, is persua- sive’’ in resolving petitioner’s habeas claim of ineffec- tive assistance of counsel [citation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).