Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/9/2012
State v. Lee
Citations
- 138 Conn. App. 420
- 52 A.3d 736
- 2012 WL 4490851
- 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that opportunity to review instructions two hours before charging conference and overnight constituted meaningful opportunity for review because counsel raised no concerns following day when queried by court
- concluding that opportu- nity to review instructions two hours before charging conference and over- night constituted meaningful opportunity for review because counsel raised no concerns following day when queried by court
- finding waiver when defense counsel merely indicated that there were no disagreements as to charge and \voiced no other exceptions or concerns\
- finding waiver when defense counsel merely indicated that there were no disagreements as to charge and ‘‘voiced no other exceptions or concerns’’
- ‘‘[i]n order to preserve an objection to a proposed jury instruction, the defendant must plainly put the trial court on notice as to the specific basis for his objection’’ (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
- in rejecting defen- dant’s claim that he properly raised concern about jury instruction on conspiracy, this court noted that defense counsel expressed concern about definition of conspir- acy but not about instruction on intent elements of conspiracy charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beach, Bear, Gruendel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarolinaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-06-18· cited 11×
- State v. CarlsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-07-02· cited 6×
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-06· cited 5×
- State v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-01-11· cited 4×
- State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-07-07
- State v. BialowasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-10-13
- State v. SienkiewiczConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-01-12
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-10-25
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 828×
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsTenth Circuit· 1990-11-27· cited 221×
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 162×
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 151×
- United States v. Patrick J. Cunningham and John J. SweeneySecond Circuit· 1982-02-18· cited 137×
- United States v. Frasiel HugheyFifth Circuit· 1998-07-21· cited 137×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-30· cited 133×
- Mother's Restaurant, Inc. v. KrystkiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-27· cited 91×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 86×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-17· cited 69×
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 65×
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-04-29· cited 65×
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 58×
- Pruitt v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 52×
- State v. DARRYL W.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-10· cited 45×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-05-16· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.