State v. Beaulieu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state’s case was not strong where only evidence other than victim’s testimony was photographs of bruising on victim
• noting that victim’s credibility remained central issue because bruise on her arm was insufficient physical evidence for state to prevail without believing victim
• “state’s case . . . was not strong” where victim’s credibility was critical issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Warholic
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 150×
• State v. Ritrovato
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 71×
• State v. ANGEL T.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
• State v. Cromety
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-17· cited 29×
• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-30· cited 23×
• State v. Quint
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-08-15· cited 16×
• State v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-11· cited 4×
• State v. Britto
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-10-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Singh
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 212×
• Erie County v. Erie County Retirees Ass'n
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 41×
• State v. Fernandez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-03· cited 37×
• State v. Beaulieu
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-11· cited 9×
• State v. Beaulieu
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-30· cited 1×