Ohio Supreme Court· 9/14/2016
State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)
Citations
- 2016 Ohio 5791
- 148 Ohio St. 3d 74
- 68 N.E.3d 790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Ohio Supreme Court has “recognized that these [double jeopardy] clauses are equivalent since at least 1893.”
- “We interpret the Ohio Due Course of Law Clause, Article 1, Section 16, as coextensive with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, O'Donnell, French, O'Connor, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, O'Neill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.