Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 9/14/2016

State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)

Citations

  • 2016 Ohio 5791
  • 148 Ohio St. 3d 74
  • 68 N.E.3d 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Ohio Supreme Court has “recognized that these [double jeopardy] clauses are equivalent since at least 1893.”
  • “We interpret the Ohio Due Course of Law Clause, Article 1, Section 16, as coextensive with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, O'Donnell, French, O'Connor, Lanzinger, Pfeifer, O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.