State v. Kamer

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2070

Syllabus

Appellant was prejudiced by the trial court's erroneous admission of impermissible Evid.R. 404(B) testimony and hearsay testimony, and the state failed to show that the errors were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial court properly excluded impeachment evidence. The trial court committed error—but not plain error—by permitting expert testimony from an unqualified witness. The indictment was not constitutionally flawed, and appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence.