Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/27/1995

State v. Ewing

Citations

258 Kan. 398
904 P.2d 962
1995 Kan. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to discuss “persuasive” argument that public safety exception applied to pre-Miranda questioning where error in admission of statement harmless
declining to discuss \persuasive\ argument that public safety exception applied to pre- Miranda questioning where error in admission of statement harmless
holding an officer's knowledge or beliefs may influence the custody issue if those suspicions are being conveyed by word or deed to the individual being questioned, but they are relevant only to the extent they would affect how a reasonable person would gauge his or her freedom of action
defendant in custody and should have been advised of his rights prior to interrogation, making statement inadmissible
defendant was in custody when officer ordered him to stop at gunpoint and asked who shot the victim
requesting a person's name and address constitutes an investigatory interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Lockett, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.