State v. Everett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]efendant’s question to Piatt also was not necessary to prove defendant’s theory because the trial court allowed ample opportunity for defendant to elicit testimony to bolster his defense without Piatt invoking his constitutional right against compelled self-incrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kaylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-17· cited 14×
• Jonatan Cortes-Maldonado v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-10-15· cited 7×
• State v. Everett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Delaware v. Fensterer
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Lotches
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
• State v. Pratt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 107×
• State v. Cox
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 53×
• State v. Baker-Krofft
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-08-27· cited 18×
• State v. Nollen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 13×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 12×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-09· cited 10×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-01-23· cited 9×