State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for a person to be guilty of common-law solicitation, it “is necessary that the defendant-solicitor ‘intend’ that the crime solicited be committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sandoval v. Sessions
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 22×
• Leonel Sandoval v. Sally Yates
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-01-27· cited 10×
• State v. Badillo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 6×
• State v. Everett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-28· cited 4×
• State v. Rhee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-17· cited 3×
• State v. Hirschman
  Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-07· cited 3×
• State v. Kimbrough
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-26· cited 1×
• Leonel Sandoval v. Jefferson B. Sessions
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-08-08

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Krummacher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-27· cited 170×
• State v. Lotches
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
• State v. Walters
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-17· cited 66×
• State v. Sargent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 33×
• State v. Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1906-01-02· cited 19×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Krieger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-03· cited 15×
• State v. Jessen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 6×
• Ralston v. Oregon State Correctional Institution
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-08-17· cited 1×