Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Supreme Court· 7/19/1994

People v. Tyburski

Citations

  • 518 N.W.2d 441
  • 445 Mich. 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing incorporation of the Sixth Amendment “fair and impartial jury” right against the states (citing Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
  • critically observing that the trial court’s “manner of questioning appears to have been focused on qualifying jurors, rather than on discerning bias”
  • “A defendant who chooses a jury trial has an absolute right to a fair and impartial jury.”
  • “[d]efendant does not have a right to have counsel conduct the voir dire”
  • “[d]efendant does not have a right to have counsel conduct the voir dire”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Cavanagh, Levin, Mallett, Riley, Griffin, Brickley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Tyburski

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.