Skip to main content

Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. Solomon

Citations

  • 204 Conn. 639
  • 529 A.2d 702
  • 1987 Conn. LEXIS 946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the rule in Connecticut that attorneys may have a lien on a judgment subject to the equitable rights of others
  • acknowledging that this “American Rule” applies in Connecticut and, generally, nationwide
  • self-executing attorney’s retaining lien is not absolute right but merely method for attorney to protect “proper fee”; it should not be used when attorney withdraws voluntarily or is discharged because of negligence or misconduct
  • “a charging lien ... is a lien placed upon any money recovery or fund due the client at the conclusion of suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Healey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.