Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/11/2009

State v. Escobedo

Citations

213 P.3d 689
222 Ariz. 252
562 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15
2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

summarizing Pandeli as involving a failure to object to proposed testimony and affirmatively arguing that it was admissible
summarizing Pandeli as involving a failure to object to proposed testimony and affirmatively arguing that it was admissible
when twelve-person jury is required by law, defendant invites erroneous jury size by submitting a joint pretrial statement indicating that an eight-person jury is proper
when twelve-person jury is required by law, defendant invites erroneous jury size by submitting a joint pretrial statement indicating that an eight-person jury is proper
“Generally, a party who participates in or contributes to an error cannot complain of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Brown, Downie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Lucero
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-12-10· cited 36×

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.