Skip to main content

March v. State

Citations

  • 734 P.2d 231
  • 105 N.M. 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court’s failure to grant a motion for a continuance in order to obtain a medical evaluation to determine capacity to form specific intent deprived the defendant of due process
  • acknowledging a criminal defendant’s right to a fair trial, right to appear, and right to present a defense
  • acknowledging a criminal defendant’s right to 16 a fair trial and right to present a defense
  • observing that the public defender's office is overburdened
  • observing that the public defender’s office is overburdened
  • denial of due process resulting from district court’s refusal to grant continuance and other actions foreclosing the defendant from raising mental-incapacity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Scarborough, Stowers, Sosa, Ransom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.