Skip to main content

State v. Ensley

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 502
  • 1996 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that, when defendant was not in custody and “just started talking,” statements were admissible at trial
  • holding only one statutory factor is needed to justify consecutive sentences
  • “While ‘mutually antagonsitic’ defenses may mandate severance in some circumstances, they are not prejudicial per se.”
  • “statements which are spontaneous and -32- volunteered are adm issible in the absen ce of Mira nda wa rnings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee, Summers, Tipton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.