Tennessee Supreme Court· 4/2/1973

State v. Bishop

Citations

493 S.W.2d 81
1973 Tenn. LEXIS 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that even a defendant’s failure to demand a speedy trial does not waive the issue
applying the factors provided by the United States Supreme Court to the Tennessee State Constitution
holding factors relevant to analysis of Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim include “(1) the length of the delay; (2) whether the defendant asserted her right to speedy trial; (3) the prejudice emanating from the delay; and (4) the reason for the delay”
finding that a delay of two years supported a defendant’s claim of lack of a speedy trial but noting that such delay “is not per se extreme and is not such a length of delay that from this fact alone we would presume prejudice”
adopting the four-part balancing test from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530-34 (1972), for analyzing whether a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated
adopting the analysis enunciated in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyer, Chattin, Humphreys, Mc-Canless, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

177 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.