State v. Hawkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There may be circumstances where an application for another warrant is impossible or impractical and, therefore, the exigencies justify such a search and seizure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sagner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-02-20· cited 48×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-07-28· cited 29×
• State v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-05-28· cited 27×
• State v. Tidyman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-08-17· cited 25×
• State v. Keys
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-04-05· cited 21×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-05-28· cited 12×
• State v. Miskell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-04-26· cited 11×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-03-23· cited 8×
• State v. Garrett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-10-19· cited 7×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-08-26· cited 3×
• State v. Christopher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-01-25· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
• Stanley v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
• Marron v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 1,400×
• State of Oregon v. Buck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-10-21· cited 40×
• State v. Elliott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 39×