State v. Rawls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instruction on conclusive presumption regarding intent was error, because jury entitled to accept or reject all or part of a defendant’s testimony or state’s evidence
• instruction on conclusive presumption regarding intent was error, because jury entitled to accept or reject all or part of a defendant's testimony or state's evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Oatney
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 42×
• State v. Rawls
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-02-26· cited 25×
• State v. Carson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-02-03· cited 22×
• State v. Zadina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-08-22· cited 17×
• State v. Addicks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-07-25· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State of Oregon v. Nodine
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-07-08· cited 66×
• State v. Elliott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 39×
• State v. Thomas
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-04-02· cited 5×
• State v. Jones
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-10-17· cited 2×