Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5742

Syllabus

On appeal from trial court's denial of a motion for resentencing, which was filed ten years after the original sentencing decision was affirmed on direct appeal. Appellant argued that his original sentence did not comply with the rules for firearm-specification sentencing as recently interpreted in State v. Beatty, 2024-Ohio-5684. Appellant's claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Dingus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.