State v. Calderon-Aparicio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting defendant's failure to detail how his defense would have changed in light of amendments 3 days before trial
• finding defendant not prejudiced by amendment because his defense at trial and evidence did not change based on amendment
• upholding an amended information when \it would be difficult to ascertain how [the defendant] would have changed or modified his defense\ to counter the elements required under the amendment
• when evidence is the same under both theories and defendant cannot specify how his defense would have changed, no substantial prejudice shown due to amendment
• noting defendant conceded he was not surprised by amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).