State v. Easterly
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1771
Syllabus
REOPENING – App.R. 26(B) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel untimely pro se application to reopen direct appeal Appellant's application was not filed within the 90-day time requirement pursuant to App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b) Appellant fails to establish good cause for the delay even assuming that Appellant had complied with the requirements of App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b), he fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984) Appellant fails to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on appeal application denied.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 313×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. DewOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-31· cited 20×
- State v. FarrowOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 11×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-09· cited 7×
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 7×
- State v. CutlipOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.