Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/12/2002
Green v. State
Citations
- 569 S.E.2d 318
- 351 S.C. 184
- 2002 S.C. LEXIS 140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court conducts a poll of the jury for the specific purpose of ensuring a unanimous verdict
- noting that the trial court conducts a poll of the jury for the specific purpose of ensuring a unanimous verdict
- recognizing \the threshold to asking the cumulative prejudicial question is to first find multiple errors\
- finding Allen charge was not coercive and did not focus on the position of the minority juror
- finding Allen charge was not coercive and did not focus on the position of the minority juror
- refusing to speculate what foreman meant when he related to the trial court the jury had reached a verdict “reluctantly” and holding this statement did not prove defendant was prejudiced
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 186×
- Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-07· cited 130×
- Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-07· cited 93×
- State v. CommanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-31· cited 51×
- McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 43×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-08· cited 36×
- Simpson v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-13· cited 18×
- State v. LemireCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-10-16· cited 14×
- Lorenzen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-11· cited 12×
- Workman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-04-15· cited 9×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-06-12· cited 8×
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 5×
- Earley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 2×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-22· cited 1×
- State v. DurantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-11-18
- State v. Randy WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-03-01
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-28· cited 141×
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-05-14· cited 114×
- United States v. Antonio Luis BurgosFourth Circuit· 1995-06-01· cited 105×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-01· cited 77×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 56×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-14· cited 42×
- Knoke Ex Rel. Estate of Knoke v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 41×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 39×
- Foye v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 27×
- State v. PaulingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-22· cited 19×
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 19×
- Frett v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-09-26· cited 11×
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.