Michigan Supreme Court· 5/11/2005
People v. Williams
Citations
- 696 N.W.2d 636
- 472 Mich. 308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering a speeding stop and “evolving circumstances” faced by the officer during the stop
- “[W]hen a traffic stop reveals a new set of circumstances, an officer is justified in extending the detention long enough to resolve the suspicion raised.”
- “A traffic stop is reasonable as long as the driver is detained only for the purpose of allowing an officer to ask reasonable questions concerning the violation of law and its context for a reasonable period.”
- “The Court of Appeals stated that there were ‘plausible’ innocent explanations for the statements made by the vehicle occupants. But the fact that such explanations can be imagined does not mean that Trooper Varoni acted unreasonably in seeking to resolve the inconsistencies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Taylor, Cavanagh, Weaver, Corrigan, Young, Markman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 259×
- People v. TierneyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-08-25· cited 171×
- People v. HydeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-09-01· cited 162×
- People v. SlaughterMichigan Supreme Court· 2011-07-01· cited 106×
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-31· cited 106×
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 94×
- People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-04-14· cited 92×
- State v. FunderburgNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-04-15· cited 80×
- People v. MullenMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-12-23· cited 65×
- People v. DillonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-05-15· cited 60×
- People v. NguyenMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-06-24· cited 58×
- People v. MaloneMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-03-30· cited 56×
- People v. HrlicMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-31· cited 48×
- People of Michigan v. Glorianna WoodardMichigan Court of Appeals· 2017-09-19· cited 48×
- People v. GillamMichigan Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 33×
- People of Michigan v. Robert Elijah AnthonyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 33×
- People v. SimmonsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-07-19· cited 31×
- People v. ReeseMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-10-14· cited 27×
- People v. LemonsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-02-21· cited 23×
- State v. MorlockCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-08-29· cited 6×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillSixth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 337×
- United States v. Yul Darnell Givan, United States of America v. Wayne TorrenceThird Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 288×
- United States v. BrighamFifth Circuit· 2004-08-19· cited 268×
- People v. ChampionMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-07-02· cited 254×
- United States v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 212×
- United States v. ChhienFirst Circuit· 2001-09-24· cited 201×
- People v. Borchard-RuhlandMichigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 199×
- People v. BurrellMichigan Supreme Court· 1983-10-17· cited 156×
- People v. JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court· 2005-02-01· cited 109×
- United States v. James LinkousEighth Circuit· 2002-04-05· cited 98×
- People v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-06-12· cited 71×
- United States v. Ronald T. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 70×
- People v. CusterMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-07-30· cited 69×
- People v. AcoffMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.