Swartzendruber v. Lamb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding inquiries and responses “were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a reversal of the judgment” because “[s]ev-eral responses were cumulative of other evidence received without objection”
• concluding inquiries and responses “were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a reversal of the judgment” because “[s]everal responses were cumulative of other evidence received without objection”
• discussing standard for recovery of litigation expense by executor and beneficiary charged with undue influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).