Skip to main content
· 10/12/2007

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Hedlund

Citations

  • 740 N.W.2d 192
  • 2007 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 124
  • 2007 WL 2965010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “judicial estoppel applies only when the position asserted by a party was material to the holding in the prior litigation”
  • finding “judicial acceptance” only “when the position asserted by a party was material to the holding in the prior litigation”
  • describing the critical role that admitting liability plays in an alternate medical care proceeding
  • “The admission of liability by Tyson Foods played no role in the dismissal of the petition by the deputy commissioner. Consequently, judicial estoppel does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.