Skip to main content

State v. Dumas

Citations

  • 750 A.2d 420
  • 2000 WL 513808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \'Can Iget a lawyer?'\ may be an unequivocal request for counsel but \'Do Ineed a lawyer?'\ is a request for advice
  • holding that the phrase \can I get a lawyer\ amounted to a colloquial request
  • holding that the phrase \can I get a lawyer\ amounted to a colloquial request
  • stating that the question of whether a suspect's words could be \reasonably understood as a request for counsel is a mixed question of law and fact\
  • explaining “Can I get a lawyer?” may be unequivocal request for counsel unlike “Do I need a lawyer?,” which is request for advice
  • refusing to extend broader custodial interrogation and self-incrimination rights under the Rhode Island Constitution to persons than those guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.