State v. Mlyniec

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admittance of prior-acts evidence was not unfairly prejudicial after “observing] that in an effort to ensure that the testimony was not unfairly prejudicial, the trial justice carefully excluded the testimony” because of “its remoteness and its potential to be cumulative”
• weighing the defendant’s “want of compunction” when reviewing his sentence of life imprisonment without parole
• weighing the defendant's \want of compunction\ when reviewing his sentence of life imprisonment without parole
• \[R]ecusal is not in order by a mere accusation that is totally unsupported by substantial fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).