Skip to main content
· 2/2/1996

David Diaz v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility

Citations

  • 76 F.3d 61
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s statements were voluntary where he was interrogated for four hours and there was no evidence that he was denied food, bathroom access, or sleep and he was not beaten, otherwise abused, or handcuffed
  • “I think I want a lawyer” and “Do you think I need a lawyer?” are not clear invocations of the right to counsel
  • “Do you think I need a lawyer” not a “clear statement” of intent to invoke counsel
  • such circumstances indicate that confession was voluntarily given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Walker, Calabresi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.