West Virginia Supreme Court· 6/10/1997

State v. Duke

Citations

489 S.E.2d 738
200 W. Va. 356
1997 W. Va. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “questions of law and interpretations of statutes and rules” are subject to a de novo review
finding that because the petitioner’s probationary term had expired, the court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation and reimpose his suspended sentence
granting court discretion to suspend sentence and release offender on probation
granting court discretion to suspend sentence and release offender on probation
granting court discretion to suspend sentence and release offender on probation
\We have recognized that probation is a privilege of conditional liberty bestowed upon a criminal defendant through the grace of the circuit court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.