Sigman v. Whyte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]here a probation violation is contested, the State must establish the violation by a clear preponderance of the evidence.”
• “Where a probation violation is contested, the State must establish the violation by a clear preponderance of the evidence.”
• “Where a probation violation is contested, the State must establish the violation by a clear preponderance of the evidence.”
• clear preponderance of the evidence
• clear preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).