· 4/6/1976
Louk v. Haynes
Citations
- 223 S.E.2d 780
- 159 W. Va. 482
- 1976 W. Va. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting forth the minimum procedural protections that must be afforded in a probation revocation hearing, including “the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses” unless good cause exists for not allowing confrontation
- “Conditions of probation which are established or modified in the absence of either the accused or his counsel are void and unenforceable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flowers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.