Skip to main content
· 4/6/1976

Louk v. Haynes

Citations

  • 223 S.E.2d 780
  • 159 W. Va. 482
  • 1976 W. Va. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth the minimum procedural protections that must be afforded in a probation revocation hearing, including “the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses” unless good cause exists for not allowing confrontation
  • “Conditions of probation which are established or modified in the absence of either the accused or his counsel are void and unenforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.