State v. Burciaga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “necessary and adequate physical care” may include protecting the child from “risks of physical injuries or illnesses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-02-13· cited 17×
• State v. Prose
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-23· cited 5×
• State v. Burciaga
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-06· cited 3×
• State v. Hilding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-29· cited 3×
• State v. Hickey
  Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-11· cited 1×
• State v. Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-10-07· cited 123×
• State v. Baker-Krofft
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. McCants
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-04· cited 11×
• State v. Drown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 10×
• State v. Baker-Krofft
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-02· cited 5×
• State v. Goetzinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 2×