Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/7/1999

State v. Dodd

Citations

10 S.W.3d 546
1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2351
1999 WL 1101397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

treating a motion for a continuance that was not accompanied by an affidavit as an oral motion to which the state had not consented
treating a motion for a continuance that was not accompanied by an affidavit as an oral motion to which the state had not consented
finding sufficient evidence of murder as a party, relying on ―DNA evidence from a cigarette butt at the crime scene— indicating appellant‘s presence during the murder‖
not indicating precisely when the oral motion for continuance was made, although it was apparently made in proximity to or during trial, and affirming denial of the motion
not indicating precisely when the oral motion for continuance was made, although it was apparently made in proximity to or during trial, and affirming denial of the motion
both the state and the defendant had attempted to subpoena the absent witnesses for prior proceedings and the defendant “conceded in his motion that he had not been able to locate the [absent witnesses] for several months before his trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Lowenstein, Ulrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.